14) Boys


I
Imagine the enormous humiliation Rehtaeh Parsons experienced when she was gang-raped by four boys at 15 years of age. An innocent person was violated in the most dehumanizing way possible. To make matters worse, pictures of the incident were posted online by the perpetrators after the incident. She had suicidal thoughts while coping with the memories of what happened. Unfortunately, at age seventeen she hanged herself and died a few days later when taken off life support. No charges were filed at the time of the sexual assault but the case has been reopened. [1]

II
While walking to class Jim, a high school sophomore, inadvertently bumped into Brad, an eleventh grader in the hallway one morning. Brad was livid and immediately went after Jim punching him a few times before a group of students broke it up. Both went to class but Brad shouted that he would find Jim after school to settle the issue. Brad did not calm down the whole day as he could not wait to find his perpetrator to get revenge. Jim was nervous the rest of the day anticipating a serious beating by a big and angry person. Fortunately, the school administration found out about the altercation and put an end to Brad's plot. They called his parents because this was not the first time he acted aggressively in school.

Incidents such as these are not uncommon and raise the question whether such impulsive outbursts can be limited through parenting and school counseling. The question has to be asked, too, why not one of the four boys had the wherewithal to halt the assault on Rehtaeh Parsons, and afterwards showed no remorse, but rather posted images of their despicable activity online.

Biochemistry and Aggression
"Violence in our society is a major concern, indeed, a national health problem," says Craig Ferris, professor of Psychology, Northeastern University. "Understanding the confluence of events, both environmental and biological, that trigger a violent act has been the focus of educators, health professionals, and scientists for decades." [2]

Scientists have found that the hormone testosterone plays a role in regulating behavior in boys, particularly aggression. It increases significantly when they reach adolescence and is associated with lower pitch voice, growth of body hair, increase muscle, and bone mass.

Furthermore, the hormone has been shown to have an effect on certain regions of the brain. When provoked, a sudden rise in testosterone in the blood stream creates a cascade of events that produce substances that affect impulsivity and self-control, and consequently the individual's personality. When aggression is noted during interpersonal encounters it arises from that individual's complex response to the biochemical interactions on the brain. There are two alternate mechanisms: 1) act impulsively for immediate action or 2) pent up anger with long term deliberation to carry out an aggressive act. Both scenarios mentioned at the beginning are likely to have elements of these mechanisms. [3]

The Sociological Perspective behind Male Behavior
hbdra.com
A PBS presentation touched on this topic during their Growing Up Masculine program: "Though the epidemic of violence that gripped young men in the U.S. from 1975 has diminished, young men in America are still the most violent in the industrialized world. And boys are not just a threat to other people; they account for 85 percent of completed suicides. All of these statistics suggest that a significant percentage of American boys are troubled psychologically; they are not finding either success or peace of mind." [4]

"Boys are really desperate to understand how to become men." says Geoffrey Canada, president of the Harlem Children's Zone in Harlem, New York. "We have to help boys understand that growing into a man is not something that your actions or your beliefs can prevent from happening. The standards of manhood should not be defined by street culture but rather by a set of values surrounding family, self and community."

He adds that "Lots of boys pick strong messages about who they are and who they want to be from the media," "The music industry presents overtly sexual messages that denigrate women and portray them as sex toys. Video games offer violent messages, and even the sports video games include taunting and teasing. Movies portray men as tough guys. And there are the subtle advertising messages aimed at boys, in the liquor ads on billboards and buses. All of these offer images of masculinity that boys strive to achieve." [5]

Michael Thompson, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist, school consultant and international speaker on the subjects focusing on the emotional lives of boys, friendships, and social cruelty in childhood. He states that certain male behaviors may be inborn. "Boys may be biologically programmed to behave in certain ways that we define as masculine. For example, boys in all cultures around the world like to wrestle, and do a lot more of it than girls do. And when boys wrestle and roughhouse, parents typically say, 'Boys will be boys.' In this way, society expects and has to pay the consequences for this type of behavior when it is no longer play." [6]

The media has been subject to criticism: "The evidence indicates that if, hypothetically, television technology had never been developed, there would be 10,000 fewer homicides each year in the United States, 70,000 fewer rapes, and 700,000 fewer injurious assaults. Violent crime would be half what it is." [7]

"….violence is not a random, uncontrollable, or inevitable occurrence. There is absolutely no doubt that higher levels of viewing violence on television are correlated with increased acceptance of aggressive attitudes and increased aggressive behavior." [8]

Michael Kimmel, Professor of Sociology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, specializes in gender studies and is the founder and editor of the academic journal Men and Masculinities. Kimmel is a spokesperson of the National Organization for Men Against Sexism (NOMAS). He places fear and shame at the very center of the social construction of men's identity. For him, men "fear that other men will unmask us, emasculate us, reveal to us and the world that we do not measure up, that we are not real men. Fear makes us ashamed. To avoid shame, men distance themselves from the feminine and all associations with it, including mothers, the world of feelings, nurturing, intimacy, and vulnerability." [9]

Alcohol is one of the significant ways men manage shame: drinking is a "maladaptive male solution to the pressure of undischarged shame." [10]

An emotionally restrictive masculinity permits men to show their feelings only "in disguised form" and so they become "mostly unrecognized, unexpressed, and misunderstood by self and others." Men, instead, express their feelings in indirect ways, often through behavior that is destructive to themselves or others. [11]

Research Experiments to Examine the Problem
Scientists have long known that damage to certain regions of the brain, most notably the prefrontal cortex, can result in violent behavior. More recently, imaging studies have identified the neural circuits that become activated in the brains of normal, healthy individuals during moral decision-making.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scientists observed that the brain regions compromised in antisocial populations include also the brain regions involved in moral decision-making. Adrian Raine, Professor of Criminology & Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania, and his colleagues, compared the brain images of 792 antisocial individuals with 704 control subjects. They found that antisocial individuals also tend to have overlapping damage in brain structures involved in making moral judgments, most notably the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala.

The findings suggest that such behavior is associated with a hyperactive response in the amygdala, an area of the brain that processes information regarding threats and fear, and with a lessening of activity in the frontal lobe, a brain region linked to decision-making and impulse control.

"Reactively aggressive adolescents – most commonly boys – frequently misinterpret their surroundings, feel threatened, and act inappropriately aggressive," says Guido Frank, professor at the University Of Colorado Department Of Psychiatry. "They tend to strike back when being teased, blame others when getting into a fight, and overreact to accidents. Their behavior is emotionally 'hot,' defensive, and impulsive."

In their most recent studies, Frank and his colleagues recruited two groups of male adolescents: one group diagnosed with reactive-affective-defensive-impulsive [RADI] behavior and the other group without any history of mental illness or aggression problems. While being scanned by a brain imaging machine, both sets of teenagers were asked to perform tasks that involved reacting to age-appropriate, fear-inducing images. The tasks also tested the teenagers' impulsivity.

The data revealed that the brains of RADI teenagers exhibit greater activity in the amygdala and less activity in the frontal lobe in response to the images than those in the control group. Again we see that either through improper parenting or genetic propensity, a person does not develop the necessary prefrontal cognition to perform appropriate social behaviors over the irrational response by the amygdala to bypass the cortex.

Moreover, Dr. B. J. Casey from the Weill Medical College of Cornell University, adds that teens are very quick and accurate in making judgments and decisions on their own and in situations where they have time to think especially when in the company of peers. However, when they have to make decisions in the heat of the moment or in social situations, their decisions are often influenced by external factors like peers.

Along that line a study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), had teen volunteers play a video driving game, either alone or with friends watching. What the researchers discovered was that the number of risks teens took in the driving game more than doubled when their friends were watching as compared to when the teens played the game alone.

This outcome indicates that teens may find it more difficult to control impulsive or risky behaviors when their friends are around, or in situations that are emotionally charged. Early adolescents, around 14 years old, took twice as many risks in a driving simulation game when they were tested with peers than when they were tested alone. Older adolescents' driving was about 50% riskier in the company of peers. Though their actions were completely inexcusable, could this explain why all four boys got into the frenzy to rape Rehtaeh Parsons?

"There are two main features that seem to distinguish teenagers from adults in their decision making," adds Laurence Steinberg, a researcher at Temple University in Philadelphia. "During early adolescence in particular, teenagers are drawn to the immediate rewards of a potential choice and are less attentive to the possible risks. Second, teenagers in general are still learning to control their impulses, to think ahead, and to resist pressure from others." These skills develop gradually, as a teen's ability to control his or her behavior gets better throughout adolescence. [12]

Peer Pressure can be a Positive Factor in Nurturing Quality Behavior
doctoryum.org
Peer pressure can be positive such as a teen joining a volunteer project because all of his or her friends are doing it, or get good grades because the social group they belong to thinks getting good grades is important. In fact, friends often encourage each other to study, try out for sports, or follow new artistic interests.

In this way, peer influence can lead teens to engage in new activities and it is quite possible that it results in building strong pathways in the brain. Neural connections that are weak or seldom used are removed during adolescence through a process called synaptic pruning, allowing the brain to redirect precious resources toward more active connections that were frequently used.

This means that teens have the potential, through their choices and the behaviors they engage in, to shape their own brain development. Therefore, skill-building activities—such as those physical, learning, and creative endeavors that teens are often encouraged to try through positive peer influence—not only provide stimulating challenges, but can simultaneously build strong pathways in the brain. [14]


Suggestions for parents
In the book Raising Cain, co-authors Michael Thompson and Dan Kindlon present the following strategies, designed to help parents nurture and protect the emotional lives of their boys, to respect their interests and needs, and help them grow up to be caring, intelligent, successful men. [6]

·   Recognize and accept the high activity level of boys and give them safe boy places to express it. "Boys need to learn how to manage their physicality to do no harm, but they need not be shamed for exuberance."

·   Talk to boys in a way that respects their pride and masculinity.

·   Teach boys that emotional courage is courage, and that courage and empathy are the sources of real strength in life. In life and art, we need to provide boys models of male heroism that go beyond the muscular, the self-absorbed, and the simplistically heroic.

·   Use discipline to build character and conscience, not enemies. "If they are unduly shamed, harshly punished, or encounter excessive adult anger, they will soon react to authority with resistance rather than with a desire to do better."


Overcoming the genetic influence to be impulsively aggressive
Avshalom Caspi, Professor, Psychology and Neuroscience at Duke University, studied a behavior-related gene that in about 34 percent of study subjects, predisposes the person toward high levels of impulsive aggressiveness. Young men with this gene version had higher levels of conduct disorder, a greater disposition toward violence, and a higher incidence of antisocial personality disorder. To show that behavior is not rigidly determined by your genetic program, his team noted that these convincing results appeared only among young men who had been severely maltreated as children but were productive, non-aggressive citizens when brought up in loving environment. [13]

Conclusion
It is speculated by neurobiologists and psychologists that the hyperactive response by the amygdala that bypasses the prefrontal cortex and leads to disruptive and aggressive behavior is likely due to improper socialization during the formative years. Proper socialization enables a child to encounter a large host of stimuli without becoming angry or sexually abusive. The amygdala is an area of the brain that processes information regarding threats and fear.

Proper emotional development enhances frontal lobe conditioning that quiets the amygdala, and allows the individual to cope with a multitude of situations as they arise. This is impulse control. It means that a boy will understand that an accidental collision in a hallway is not meant to cause humiliation and does not require a response other than perhaps "excuse me."

It also means that this conditioned frontal cortex tells the individual that an imminent [testosterone-led] passion that could be a forceful sexual encounter should not be pursued. Why? He has a sense of empathy for the victim and/or is in fear of the consequential punishment. He is likely, also, to thwart his peer group from carrying out such a morally reprehensible act.

References
[1] Gallman, S., Gast, P., 2 face charges in case of Canadian girl who hanged self after alleged rape, Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., August 11, 2013

[2] Brain Chemicals Involved In Aggression Identified: May Lead To New Treatments, sciencedaily.com, November 7, 2007
Retrieved from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071106122309.htm


[4] 'Growing Up Masculine'

[5] Geoffrey Canada, Fist Stick Knife Gun, a Personal  History of Violence in America. President and CEO, Harlem Children's Zone, Beacon Press; Revised edition (September 28, 2010)
[6] Michael Thompson, Ph.D., Co-Author, Raising Cain; Host, PBS documentary, RAISING CAIN



[9] Kimmel MS. Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In: Brod H, Kaufman M, eds. Theorizing Masculinities. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1994.

[10] Krugman S. Male development and the transformation of shame. In: Levant RF, Pollack WS, eds. A New Psychology of Men. New York: Basic; 1995.

[11] Lynch J, Kilmartin C. The Pain Behind the Mask: Overcoming Masculine Depression. New York: Haworth; 1999

[12] Chein, J., Albert, D., O'Brien, L., Uckert, K., and Steinberg, L., Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry, Dev Sci. 2011 Mar; 14(2): F1–F10.

[13] Caspi, A., et al. "Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children." Science 297 (2002): 851-854.

[14] Peer Pressure: It's Influence on Teens and Decision Making, Scholastic.com, 2008